What we build
Specship turns product requests, bug reports, screenshots, and implementation tickets into acceptance criteria, failing tests, code changes, and review-ready pull requests. It is not positioned as a chat-only coding assistant. The durable output is a normal engineering artifact: a branch, a PR, checks, comments, and review context.
Why it exists
AI coding tools are useful, but teams still need a reliable definition of done. Specship is built around the parts that make agent-generated code reviewable: explicit criteria, tests before implementation, visible policy boundaries, and a human review loop.
How the product is designed to work
The request stays in the tool where the team already tracks work.
The agent drafts acceptance criteria and asks when the request is ambiguous.
Failing tests capture the expected behavior before implementation code is written.
The team reviews code, tests, coverage, risk notes, and follow-up commits in Git.
Claim accuracy during beta
We intentionally keep public claims narrow while the product is in private beta. Public pricing is not final. SOC 2 is not claimed as complete. Self-hosted runners and enterprise controls should be treated as rolling out or planned unless a current page explicitly says otherwise.
This matters for buyers and for search quality: the site should be useful, accurate, and specific rather than overpromising capabilities that are still being validated.
Proof library
Real customer case studies should only be published after approval. Until then, these clearly labeled synthetic examples show the level of review evidence Specship is being designed to produce.
Contact and official profiles
- Waitlist: specship.dev/waitlist
- General contact: hello@specship.dev
- Security contact: security@specship.dev
- Indie Hackers: indiehackers.com/product/spec-ship